General Order 559 on Revised Electronic Filing Procedures
The court's General Order concerning revised electronic filing procedures was signed by Chief Judge Carla E. Craig on April 23, 2010.
NOTE: The guidelines set forth regarding the submission of orders via CM/ECF supersede the section of the Administrative Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases relating to submission of orders.
Privacy Protection for Filings made with the Court
Redaction Requirements
In 2001, the Judicial Conference adopted a policy on privacy and public access to electronic case files that allowed internet-based access to civil and bankruptcy case filings, as long as certain personal information (i.e., Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, names of minor children, and dates of birth) had been redacted by the attorney or party filing the document. The redaction requirements of the Conference’s privacy policy were largely incorporated into the Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure, effective December 1, 2007.*
As noted above, a key tenet of these rules (as well as the precursor Conference policy) is that redaction of personal identifiers lies with the filing party. The Advisory Committee Note accompanying Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 states "[T]he clerk is not required to review documents filed with the court for compliance with this rule. The responsibility to redact filings rests with counsel and the party or non-party making the filing."
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9037(a), unless the court orders otherwise, documents filed with the court may include only :
- the last four digits of a Social Security number and taxpayer identification number;
- the year of an individual’s birth;
- a minor’s initials (for individual, other than the debtor, known to be and identified as a Minor); and
- the last four digits of a financial account number.
With the exception of transcripts, redaction of the information described in Fed. R. Bankr. P. Rule 9037(a) is the responsibility of the person filing the document. When a transcript is filed, the attorneys and pro se parties who attended the hearing are solely responsible for redaction of the information described in the Rule. Redaction is accomplished only with input from the attorneys and pro se parties who attended the hearing. Transcribers are not responsible for identifying a need for redaction or for redacting transcripts absent a request by an attorney or pro se party.
The court’s responsibility is to follow the Judicial Conference guidelines for providing public access to the transcript and for restricting access in accordance with the Judiciary’s privacy policy.
The clerk is not required to review documents filed with the court for compliance with this rule.
The responsibility to redact filings rests with counsel and the party or non-party making the filing.
* See Fed. R. App. P. 25(a), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9037, Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1.